Intellectual Property

Review of 'Wired Shut,' by Tarleton Gillespie

At long last, my review of Tarleton Gillespie's book on copyright in the digital era -- Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture -- is done and published in the Resource Center for Cyberculture Studies. (Just to be clear, though: The 9-month lag time was due almost entirely to my procrastination, not to RCCR or my editor, David Silver.)

I'll post the review to the articles archive soon, but for now you can find it here -- and see Gillespie's response here.

Stealing to Prevent Theft

In reading Wired News' exclusive on a hacker's work against The Pirate Bay for the MPAA, I'm stumped. Which is more ridiculous?

  1. That the Motion Picture Association of America, in its mission to fight the theft of Hollywood blockbusters by the Bittorrent crowd, bought stolen information about TorrentSpy.com; or

Fair Use? Fat Chance

Has everyone forgotten that copyright exists primarily to encourage the public good that can come from intellectual property? That helping to compensate the content creator is a means for getting good ideas out there, not an end unto itself?

The Wall Street Journal reports today that a coalition of "Internet, media and technology companies" is set to announce... a set of guidelines they have agreed on aimed at protecting copyrights online."

Radiohead's Latest: Maybe There's Honor Among Thieves After All...

In RainbowsRadiohead's new album, "In Rainbows," dropped early this morning in the band's experiment with DRM-free, digital-only distribution for whatever a fan is willing to pay.

Of course, "DRM-free" also means "super-easy to share."

YouTube & Copyright: A Lie on Two Levels

Jeff Atwood is taking YouTube to task for its wink-wink, nudge-nudge approach to uploading copyrighted video clips.

It's a valid point, and I especially like his quip that "by YouTube's own rules, YouTube cannot exist." But YouTube's copyright tips also qualify as a "big copyright lie" in another sense: they seriously downplay the importance of fair use.

The Fair Use Fight: It's the Narrative, Stupid

On ars technica yesterday, Nate Anderson wrote about the Computer & Communications Industry Association's "Defend Fair Use" initiative.

It's a nice run-down of the effort by Oracle, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Sun, Red Hat, and others to rein in the overly broad copyright notices that accompany sports broadcasts, DVDs and a wide range of other "big media." Toward the end, however, Anderson notes:

When Does Imitation Become the Sincerest Form of Rip-Off?

I'm in the process of reviewing Tarleton Gillespie's Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture, which (so far) is a very smart look at an issue that's of great personal and professional interest to me. So rather than just scribble in the margins, I thought I'd drop random questions, observations and interesting factoids here as I work my way through the book.

I would say this is the first of many posts in a series, but hopefully there won't be too many -- the review itself is due soon...

Google & GrandCentral: Addressing Copyright Concerns

It's safe to assume that Google, in purchasing GrandCentral, didn't set aside millions of dollars as a hedge against lawsuits like it did as part of the YouTube acquistion. So it's not surprising to see Grandcentral -- which offers "one phone number for all your phones, for life" -- making some quick changes to curtail possible copyright-infringement claims.

| Image 1 of 2 |
Grand Central E-mail about RingShare

Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio

Creative Commons LicenseMany articles on this site are covered by traditional copyright, and may not be reproduced without express permission. All other content on TroySchneider.com is owned exclusively by Troy K. Schneider, and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Need permissions beyond the scope of this license? Please submit a request here.

Syndicate content